"Dragonrider1227" wrote:The way I see it though, the movie may have been light, but it's like an introductory to the character for a new audience and you don't want to give them too much at once. Too much angst and deep allegories may have turned them off. (On the other hand, I AM seeing kids under 12 watching Death Note. So who knows?) Anyway, the lighter tone offers a great way to introduce him to kids then kids start looking for more and find the other animes. I've already seen this happening in some places. Amusing story, I once was at a super market getting Groceries. Near checkout line, they have this rack of discount DVDs and the 2003 Astro Boy anime was there and I heard some kid go "ASTRO BOY!" I looked and saw him and another boy look at the DVD and one of them said "He's naked." XD
I don't see why they couldn't have made it a tad more darker, like how the 1980s were (yet they still stayed lighthearted overall). Also, not to be the hater, but I think the movie would have done better overall if the company didn't make so many 'creative changes' so to speak (i.e., adding characters, using a new plot, ect).
I mean, I like the movie, but mostly as itself and not as an Astroboy movie.
(RANT: Seriously though, in every series the kid gets hit by a car, and now he just explodes. Why change that? I mean seriously, that was the one constant throughout the series (well, that and Pluto...). /rant) I just think they tried to make Astro too 'tough' and threw out all his innocence (not to mention that voice...ugh). The only characters I am pleased with are Dr. Ochanomizu (I refuse to call him Elefun) and Tenma.
![Tenma :tenma:](./images/smilies/imported_tenma.gif)
I can understand projecting the movie to a younger audience, but they should have tried harder. >:I
...but, I still saw it twice at the movies...
![Tenma :tenma:](./images/smilies/imported_tenma.gif)